Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
Your right suchmoon, I forgot to add that I built my initial Shark Nodes from XPY to ION swap opportunity offered by Huey. I was swapping the XPY for IONs at less than 2 cents apiece. Therfore the cost basis was around 14.5 cents per ION. This was a wonderful opportunity to exit the Paycon adventure. I store these IONs in Ionomy LTD stakers and double my daily profit by applying Electrons to them daily!!! This revenue stream provides me free IONs daily for as long as Ionomy LTD is in business.
That would be the same Huey who told you to buy XPY and XPYBits before he told you to swap to ION? Who propped up the dead scam for a year?
As for 2 cents a piece... you're lying now, or you lied here:
https://archive.fo/hyF8N#selection-9982.0-10057.42
Quote
I bought my 100 XPY when it went to .00201
The IONs that you got by converting those paycoins cost you 0.016 BTC or ~$220 each. Good luck breaking even.
I was just trying to be funny, but I do employ number one myself at times. Not on purpose, but I do love beer.
Like we discussed earlier, not sure how you prove anything, but creative accounting aside, I've had a very positive experience from my investment. Don't really want to give details in a public space. If I was from the outside looking in, trying to vet an investment, the ION math is pretty much public knowledge. I have in the past, with quite a few investment thoughts, pretended to invest on a spreadsheet and then compared actual performance over a certain time span to judge if I wanted to enter an investment. Other than liquidity, and entry timing of ION, (oh and being a shitcoin
)what part of the math doesn't work out in your analysis? I hope you realize by now that I am not out to pick a fight, but if we only listen to people that agree with us, we may lose important perspectives.
Like we discussed earlier, not sure how you prove anything, but creative accounting aside, I've had a very positive experience from my investment. Don't really want to give details in a public space. If I was from the outside looking in, trying to vet an investment, the ION math is pretty much public knowledge. I have in the past, with quite a few investment thoughts, pretended to invest on a spreadsheet and then compared actual performance over a certain time span to judge if I wanted to enter an investment. Other than liquidity, and entry timing of ION, (oh and being a shitcoin
)what part of the math doesn't work out in your analysis? I hope you realize by now that I am not out to pick a fight, but if we only listen to people that agree with us, we may lose important perspectives. You posted the numbers yourself... price-wise ION underperforms even the granddaddy of all coins BTC, not to mention top altcoins, and that's just 2017. Looks far worse if you go back to the ICO.
Math gets wonky when you start including or excluding arbitrary components, like staking or forks, or fudge the cost basis like Shark is doing.
And that's before we even get to assessing the risk of a 100%-premined, 75%-team-owned, centralized, opaque, illiquid coin. I guess "shitcoin" covers all that, just being more specific here.