As an investor, I ask to hold a shareholder's vote to dramatically reduce a dividend, and limit paying up to 10% of profits at most. This is required for growth and for NRE.
Else the company will not be able to grow.
We must establish a growth fund.
Why not 5%? What is the rational for 10%? Do we vote every month to vary this percentage?
The prospectus is quite clear that dividends are paid after all expenses are deducted and this includes payment for new hashing power to go towards in-house mining. Remember the original AMC proposal got too complex and the new ActM is intentionally much simpler, and we are all the better for it, in my opinion. A 10% cap will needlessly limit the share price, which isn't what you want with a high risk, high growth stock.