You still haven't given a serious answer if you think Craig is Satoshi. It was a serious question. No shame if you think he might be - at least it would explain your behavior.
Sorry, I couldn't resist making the JJG theory.

But seriously, if you've read any of the papers written by CSW it is very clear that he is not the same person who wrote the Bitcoin white paper or communicated here on the forum in the early days.
Here's a critique I did on CSWs recent paper (that he later retracted) where he tried (and failed) to prove the Eyal and Sirer's selfish mining attack was a fallacy:
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/wright-or-wrong-lets-read-craig-wrights-selfish-miner-fallacy-paper-together-and-find-out.2426/CSW later bet me 1 BTC on this question, and lost (and never paid up), which is not a question that Satoshi would get wrong:

That said, CSW does seem to have information about early bitcoin that makes me think that he might have somehow been involved. But, no, he is not Satoshi.
It doesn't bother you then that as the face of Bcash you have aligned yourself with a man who you know knowingly lied to the world on mulitple occasions for his own personal fame or delusion?
And does it not bother you that other faces of Bcash have publicly stated that they believe CSW is Satoshi?
I mean, can you not see how to many of us, Bcash might seem like a complete centralized shitshow?
Oh and of course Coinbase and Bitpay added BCH, they are both owned by self proclaimed big blockers, one of which has shilled ETH for years.