Hey there!
I'd like to dispute our stakes received for our publishing about trade.io. Apparently, our ICO report about Trade.io was pushed as "No Views - Low Quality."
https://bitsify.net/ico-list/trade-io-disrupting-trade-innovation/I don't agree with this decision to say the least, first up, No Views makes no sense, our Alexa rank is about ~150K, with alone stats of 200K + monthly UNIQUE visitors, excludin our even biger reccuring visitors totalling about ~8,000,000 page requests per month. It's quite absurd to rate our site as No Views when other sites in the spreadsheet, example, BitcoinFilter (
http://bitcoinfilter.com/2017/11/09/trade-io-review-and-ico-detail/) received 200 tokens on 2 different events whilst their site is ranked at a Global Alexa Rank of 3,634,628. This is just one readily available example on the spreadsheet.
All writings published on our site are conclusive and quantitive reports, non-biased. Please re-check our in-depth writings about Trade.io published here:
https://bitsify.net/ico-list/trade-io-disrupting-trade-innovation/We hope to see your reasoning if need be.
Thanks!