I always hear Substratum ist overvalued and Shift is undervalued, because it seems to have a product.
Sub has no working product yet - like 95% other coins in the top 100 (cardano, iota, eos...)
So why it so? Maybe there is something wrong the product or the marketing.
I think that's bad signal for Shift to have a working product and don't gain the attention.
I'm pretty sure that when Substratum open its beta it will explode, while Shift is going to hang around at the second page at cmc.
Maybe I'm wrong, but my feelings say that Substratum will win this game
As I said, Sub had a massive ICO, while Shift did not. Shift had higher % growth the last month than Sub did, but it was so small at the beginning that it is still ranked 200.
While Shift went from rank ~350 to ~200 in the last month, Sub went from 75 to 70. Shift is catching up.
I am just wondering the process is not happening faster, because it should...
I don't really care about absolute rankings though - I am saying Shift is better because not only is it better technologically, but it is also smaller, and has higher potential for growth.
Shift can easily do a 10x and be reasonably valued. Can Sub? Only if you believe it deserves to be a top 20 coin.