Update on this one, there appears to be another channel of info we've been ignoring (or not talking about publicly on this forum). Props to smracer for noticing it. If you view the "skinny/fat" inner flame as another channel of data, then there is an *almost* 16 digit match between the outer bottom height and it's skinnyness. Flame # 9 counting r 2 l along the outer bottom doesn't match with this otherwise perfect match. The interpretation of the skinnyness is a bit more subjective than the others but once you've spent some time deciding between them it becomes easier to call. This track contains the weird solid red flame most have been ignoring. See for yourself and let me know what you think. Perhaps we could compare our skinny/fat calls and start using this new channel of data for playing around with... Not quite as solid a lead as alphabetcannary's discovery but I think it's significant.
There might be one more channel of data not picked up on yet. I'll let you know once I've poked around with it a bit.
As you are saying it is subjective, but in my interpretation of skinnyness, there are two flames, namely #6 and #9, that don't match. Both flames are thin (skinny as you call it) and long, while the match for thin in outer bottom is short. Again, it is subjective. I think I found a mismatch or two of my interpretation of skinnyness with what zbyszek2 posted (he called it blob in his post), too