It was very difficult for me to work on the project during the holidays and I restarted this week.

I made some calculation to estimate the number of blocks for a given block time during the 100% PoW period:

With 120 sec. block time and 100K blocks, the PoW duration would be about 4 and a half months. I would let us enough time to develop and to test the next wallet release including PoS/PoC, Master Nodes and Super Stakers.

With a faster block time during the PoS/PoC period, we would get a fast blockchain growth:

- 15 sec. block: 2.102 Mil blocks / year
- 30 sec. block: 1.051 Mil blocks / year
- 60 sec. block: 0.525 Mil blocks / year = an acceptable growth

3 and a half years after launch, Coin2.1 blockchain height is about 1.92 Mil blocks and the db size is 3.3 GB with 60 sec. block. Consequently, it looks difficult to adopt a faster block time and I'm not sure of the real advantage knowing that exchanges are often requesting more confirmation than the coin network.

The next step is to define the reward per block with X super blocks and with a halving at block #50000. I'm also thinking about the block size and more detailed specification. My idea is to create a poll to get the opinion of the community on this matter.

My thought regarding your proposal: yes, it is easy to define a block reward matching the number of PoW blocks and the total reward allocated to the miners as well. It is the next step here

My last thought regarding the inflation: a good strategy may help to increase the demand and the supply together while balancing the market. My disquiet is to succeed in growing the capital almost so quickly as the supply, so that the inflation doesn't affect the real coin value.

I received a first good proposal for the new coin name and the online submission form is almost ready. I'm going to release the link very soon.