Question for everyone, what are the signs of a good whitepaper and also signs of a bad one.
They have to be very studied at the beggining.. the WP is one of the most important things of an ico, if it has been writen by a 15 years old guy, the entire ICO is going to be the biggest shit that has been created so far.
So for me, if they have a great design and a good proper language, it is a good one.
Whitepaper being the eye for the investors whether to invest or not must be detailed and in accordance to their goal and organization, does it indicate the growth and process of the project. It should be clear to understand and to read as well. It should explain the good return of investment. That's why many preferred to invest on trusted companies or organizations, those who have already a product to lessen their time to read set of pages of whitepaper. But they should still read it to not miss out any detailed to not regret investing at the end.