It's very interesting that suprnova hasn't replied to my post regarding the fee issue...
I would also appreciate an official response from the zero team.
A short time ago, some community members reacted against imposing a 1% fee towards Zero maintenance, development and promotion costs.
Well it looks like suprnova has already imposing a fee behind the miners back! And most miners had no idea!
Wouldn't it far better to introduce an official Zero pool collecting this fee, rather than a dishonest private pool depriving from the zero team this significant source of income that would help the coin flourish?
I am not surprised have heard nothing from that guy. I deleted my post (that was reply to yours) last night because intention not to be negative and/or slanderous.
It seems some people's role is to be liars because so many people love to be lied too. Who are the 'so many'? The ones who ignored your post and still mine on Supernova. Why are they still mining on Supernova in full awareness of the imposed tax that is lied about? Not sure why it seems to be human nature to appreciate exploitation. ARGH!
I will shut up now but hopes that people would get a clue from the gigantic picture you have posted and mine on a different pool. You have my thanks, at minimum, for revealing the truth and talking about it. Transparency is very important these days!
PS: on the other side of the coin perhaps it is simply a misunderstanding! maybe the pool charges 0% and the 1% on the balance sheet is the Zero commission ... ?
I really appreciate your response on this thread as well as your personal message.
It is not a commission to zero, as there is no such commission forced yet. It is on the roadmap, planned for the future but not just yet.
You can also verify this by looking up zero community address t1XpvXbN3UoBZf4yEsmz3oQt9UGp2TCEUu3 at the zeroexplorer.
It is easy to see that the last payment received was on January 8th and that this address has received a total of 126 coins so far, an amount far less than the amount that would appear if suprnova was sending the collected fee there.
So the confusion (of the official 1% zero fee addition) would appear to be advantageous to the exploiter. hmm, wondering how frequently 'that guy' checks this thread, and surprised at no response. I don't have any ability to change "official" links (on website, announcement, etc) but I would suggest that somebody seeks clarification from the owner of the pool and subsequently removes the (any official) advert. for that pool from the official Zero pages if no appropriate response is received. it seems like a foolish thing to endorse an exploiter.
I don't think we should let this issue out of sight until it is resolved. I would encourage anyone who likes to use that pool for their mining to write to the admin and ask him why he is stealing/lying (whatever you want to call it) or simply migrate to a different pool.