People who are getting rich via shady pathways are traditionally arrogant and history repeats itself.

When a false 0% label brings you 80% of the market share and you are being uncovered, you are expected to be humble and apologize, even to pay back the fees you "accidentally" collected.

It is clear that suprnova's explosion of market share started and was sustained thanks to this post:


Just like you are not following this "cesspool" thread, miners are not following your tweets nor enter the main suprova page, as they just follow the direct pool link that was found in this ANN and in zero's main page. So all they would see is 0% fee and make their choice, since your main competitor was charging 2% and other pools more than 0%.

Most miners do not see the detailed statistics nor understand them; There many numbers on suprnova statistics that are either incorrect or difficult to understand so the excuse that transactions are visible is not good enough. Some people even believed that you were contributing towards zero development or that this fee was imposed by the zero community!

As for the comment on "other pools that go down for hours", it is very interesting how you are aware of this, since you have been so busy and away from this ANN. Maybe all those DDOS attacks can be explained now...

Now regarding the posts from noob accounts, it looks like they are all defending suprnova, so your argument becomes a boomerang coming back to you. Au contraire, long time members such as ethflex in the message above, are accusing you for fraud and for ignoring them.

I rest my case.