Alright, I have technical objections to quantum1net.

Primarily, how is your proposal quantum-safe? The only thing talked about in the papers is a quantum random number generator, something that has been done for years. But random numbers does not give a quantum safe cryptosystem, you need a quantum-safe algorithm in order to protect against quantum computers.

In the proposal you try to show that your random numbers are "better" than a classical RNG/PRNG, however you do not even show the results from a randomness test battery like Diehard/Dieharder.

In fact, quantum random number generators are often worse than a PRNG, as shown by a student of mine. I would be happy to link that research paper, but in the meantime, I'd first like to see technical arguments that substantiate your claims.