It is interesting to see that the defenders of Spectrecoin vary in the claim that:
1. Spectrecoin has already its anonymity features.
2. Spectrecoin will implement its anonymity features in Q2 2018.
Here are people who are not related to the Spectrecoin community, such as generalizethis, they say lies and then they themselves refute their lie 1. Spectrecoin has already its anonymity features.
2. Spectrecoin will implement its anonymity features in Q2 2018.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2760432.msg28210253#msg28210253What has already been implemented, and what will be implemented clearly visible on the official website: https://spectreproject.io/roadmap/
1. Spectrecoin has already its anonymity features: Ring-signatures, Stealth-addresses, Tor, OBFS4
2. Spectrecoin will implement its anonymity Innovative features that hasn't any other coins in Q2 2018: Stealth-staking
I lied? Or you misread?
I'm pretty sure you have a tenuous grasp of the English language.
Anyway, my point in the OP stands. Whether you like it or not, the dev is promising moon-features without outlining how that moon-feature will work--that's vaporware. And if he's aware that he can't build it (and not just stupid or arogant) that's a scam.
you could not even go to the site and see the roadmap, your just anthoughtless and emotional hater: https://spectreproject.io/roadmap/
Spectrecoin already has features (Ring-signatures, Stealth-addresses, Tor, OBFS4) that much better than in other much more expensive coins. When the factory already produces a Mercedes S-class $150 K (analogy Ring-sig, Stealth-address, Tor, OBFS4), and promises in the future to release a Mercedes-Maybach S600 Pullman $1 Million (analogy Stealth-staking), following your logic a Mercedes S-class is scam - only very stupid people will listen to you.
Why do you want stealth-staking if you can't even get any IP or TX data when I do conventional staking? I wrote you my address: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2760432.msg28208865#msg28208865 It is obvious that you do not possess the technical knowledge.
I changed the OP--but thought that it would be read as a claim and not an implementation, but I can see how you misread it--though wonder why I would be questioning its existence, if it already existed? Seems a dumb thing to have to point out, but there you go--good luck misreading it and using that as an attack vector.
As for spectrecoin's other features, who cares? That is not what the thread is asking--though I wonder how any coin calls itself private and has a richlist. See "RICH LIST" "LARGEST WALLETS" https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xspec/
Meanwhile, the major point in all this, no one being able to explain how anonymous staking works, gets buried by shills talking around it.