Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: If we think privacy and fungibility is important, we need to work harder on that
by
Coin-Keeper
on 16/01/2018, 20:10:51 UTC
Do you really want to softfork to add that functionality as a default?

A soft-forked change cannot be mandatory, it will always be opt-in, by definition.


Enhancing Bitcoin privacy is a must, and not for "die-hard" reasons. The privacy of transacting in a form of money affects it's effectiveness in performing the role of being money. The goal is to implement and popularise a form of independent electronic money, and so compromising Bitcoin's money characteristics is obviously anathema to that goal.



Agreed.  I am always surprised that users might be happy with "partial" anonymity.  I can achieve full privacy but it takes a bunch of effort and lots of internet experience to achieve it.  Why not make it easy and in fact default?