So you think there isn't any difference between bitcoin and a random coin
None of them remove middlemen or counter party risk, therefore have 0 fundamentals. Or to put it differently, whether you like or dislike him, Martin Armstrong defines metals as being a hedge against government. Something that doesn't remove middlemen is obviously not a hedge against government, because as I stated before, transactions are not blinded and the govt can just walk into the mining buildings and claim anyone who doesn't worship them is a terrorist and has their transactions blocked.
Entities like the G20 will obviously form such policies. This makes it a permissioned ledger or tyranny by default. What is bitcoin a hedge against? NOTHING. It operates on the govt's infrastructure and it costs virtually nothing to run a police state in the digital world like when Iran supposedly shut off access to Telegram recently. On the other hand, the cost to run a police state covering the physical planet is almost infinite orders of magnitude higher, and thus not possible.
You have no idea what you are talking about. I've sold stuff for bitcoin and bought stuff with bitcoin. It doesn't need a middleman to work.