3. use any object not belonging to others and make it his property;
Really? You mean like wolves, riparian zones, water, old growth forests, and such?
As I've said, these fantasy documents and their authors remain woefully ignorant of such concepts as ecosystem services, ecology, and such.
As soon as you guys come up with something written by someone who actually knows stuff, I'd be interested to read it.
Is your objection to private property, or how its appropriated? Individuals have appropriated all of the things you mentioned as private property.
This isn't a fantasy document, but a real one. How would the author's supposed ignorance of ecology affect law? Do you think a state protects the ecosystem better?