Most people will have made money from it unless the bulk of their loans were in the the last few months.
Pretty much the definition of a ponzi, just replace "most" with "some".
I'm fed up of replying to all the nutcases. They were not a Ponzi. They were paying back less BCC coins in interest and capital releases than was being loaned to them. They didn't stop for financial reasons. If people just held the coins they would have profited more than from using their infamous lending program. So why say the lending was a Ponzi when it was the complete opposite? They also brought value in guaranteeing the capital amount invested so people didn't have to worry about their cryptos falling in value whilst also paying a percentage each day (less than the growth of the coin - they never guaranteed any percentage and many days it was zero percent). They seem to have been forced to close as they could have carried on with no financial issues.