I disagree with the Death Penalty, It is better for the offender to be sentenced to life imprisonment. The death penalty is not the best solution, it is a decisive effort that shows that no one can try to find another solution to overcome this in addition to eliminating the lives of people.
I agree with you on certain aspects. It is true that life without parole is a much harsher punishment when compared to the death penalty. But at the same time, life sentence is not as effective as the death sentence, to install a sense of fear in the minds of criminals. Perhaps we need to add torture to the life without parole package to make it more "appealing" to the criminals.
..See if a police has a gun then why be nice just kill so now the crime as become way way worse..
If the police carry guns the criminals will and then bombs and then in gangs throwing petrol bombs at police..
See if we all had money then no one need to do crime?
..BUT even PRESIDENTS and KINGS and QUEENS kill for monies BUT i suppose they get a free PASS?..
Yes Sithara007 you give those types of people a pass
< HYPOCRITE ..2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS then boom to NY buildings where all the paper work for the
2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS was held
..Oh and a 1 billion dollar insurance scam..
BUT hay never mind only thousand died and the world got put in DEBT especially the YANKS..