Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: 100% sure Lauda is a fraudster
by
shorena
on 19/01/2018, 11:45:13 UTC
⭐ Merited by donmiguello (1)
7 months ago you said you were quitting the forum.[1] Roll Eyes

The burden of proof is not on me.
Nope. It is exactly on you. If my account were to look suspicious, I'd get tagged and others would ask me to provide proof of ownership.

Just minutes after I made a free comment on this post
Maybe, when you are guilty, you should avoid drawing attention to yourself. A lot of people got caught this way.

[1] Quickseller story 2.0.

I am not guilty of anything. The burden of proof is always on the party who made the accusation. It is also a common sense.
-snip-

It is, but not here and not in this case. My issues with Lauda also do not apply here, so asking for my assistence does not give you any bonus points just because they and I had a difficult history.

An account can be sold without leaving any publicly available data, thus proving an account has actually been sold is not possible. On the other hand it is easily possible to proof you are still the same person by proving a signed message. Either using your PGP key, should you have made one public, or using a bitcoin adress via which you have received funds in the past. Sometimes neither is possible, but this is only in the hands of the account owner. I tried my best in the past to make signing message as easily accessible to as many people as possible and other members have tried to make sure people "stake" an address for these cases.

With all said above, it is - of course - still possible to sell a private PGP or bitcoin key. Thus a signed message is no solid proof either. It is hover (or was, I am a bit out of touch) considered unlikely considering they keys are often used for other reasons as well.

tl;dr: I cant help you here, nor anyway else with similar issues. People will - out of spit or other reasons - dig into your history and try to find something they can use against you.