Re: «Envion» Highest ROI crypto infrastructure | $2M Bounty available!
yombu
TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BOUNTY MANAGER!
Hello guys, I've been monitoring complaints about the projects and I write on the forum if I find something.
The bounty manager of Envion project is probably scamming people. I'm saying "probably" because I wait for his explanation. I read many complaints about their signature campaign and lots of people are complaining about the mistakes in post counting.
I checked the posts of people complaining about post counts and they're mostly correct! The bounty manager is making a huge mistake, I don't know why. Maybe he makes this on purpose.
ONE QUESTION: WHY YOU COUNTED PEOPLE'S POSTS INCORRECTLY ON PURPOSE?
If a person exceeded the minimum post count of 30 within the ICO period, you wrote something below 30, probably randomly, I don't see any logic behind this. It shouldn't be that hard to count people's posts.
I remember that there were post counts on the spreadsheet 5-6-7-8 days prior to the ICO end. What is the point of this? You should have counted the posts after the ICO ends only. Counting the posts before the ICO end is just meaningless.
Please correct the situation and provide an explanation to the public or Envion project will be a subject to a scam just because of your incredible mistakes.
Answer this immediately or I'll gladly report this situation to the scam monitoring websites, organizations and platforms.
NOTE: This post will be edited if the problem is fixed by the bounty manager.
TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BOUNTY MANAGER!
Hello guys, I've been monitoring complaints about the projects and I write on the forum if I find something.
The bounty manager of Envion project is probably scamming people. I'm saying "probably" because I wait for his explanation. I read many complaints about their signature campaign and lots of people are complaining about the mistakes in post counting.
I checked the posts of people complaining about post counts and they're mostly correct! The bounty manager is making a huge mistake, I don't know why. Maybe he makes this on purpose.
ONE QUESTION: WHY YOU COUNTED PEOPLE'S POSTS INCORRECTLY ON PURPOSE?
If a person exceeded the minimum post count of 30 within the ICO period, you wrote something below 30, probably randomly, I don't see any logic behind this. It shouldn't be that hard to count people's posts.
I remember that there were post counts on the spreadsheet 5-6-7-8 days prior to the ICO end. What is the point of this? You should have counted the posts after the ICO ends only. Counting the posts before the ICO end is just meaningless.
Please correct the situation and provide an explanation to the public or Envion project will be a subject to a scam just because of your incredible mistakes.
Answer this immediately or I'll gladly report this situation to the scam monitoring websites, organizations and platforms.
NOTE: This post will be edited if the problem is fixed by the bounty manager.
I believe that the campaign crew is not fair.
so what should we do?what happening is really not fair
Unfair campaigns also harm investors.
Examples of this are available.
Spam messages should be rewarded.
Participants had to be closed after January 1st.
After that date, a lot of spam was done in 2 weeks.
Authentication should be done as in ico process.
Line 335 (ME)
Rank :
?Date 12/1/2017 18:36:08
Number of posts at the time of submission 248
Updated Post Count 90
They have not updated for weeks.
line 1045
1/11/2018 7:25:45
post count 90
I had the same values before this person came.
I wrote for weeks, but they did not.
my rank is also out of date.