A miner fee still violates the GPL.
If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.
If you're going to talk about GPL, go to their easy to use website and just site me the topic matter. They literally cover everything. If he charges a 'subscription', he still has to give the source to everyone that uses it. Just the same as with a one time fee.
GPL violation is because of not giving away source files, not because of fee. So, Your statement "A miner fee still violates the GPL" is wrong. Do You agree?
Obviously SP isn't going to release the source dumbass, the entire conversation was literally about him not doing that. Like there is no room for a different interpretation of what we were talking about. Backpedal away though.
Two obvious things:
1. You are hopeless case of person not capable to clean after shitting around.
2. sp_ is going to release sources at the moment some open source foundation realizes that sp_ collected enough money breaking GPL to raise charges against.
Great insult. You should stick to cherry picking a sentence without context from the entirety of paragraphs they're used in as it seems to be the only way you can win a argument. You're like the guy that was in here arguing grammar, punctuation, and spelling as if that makes for any sort of argument outside of an english class.
"Hopless case..." I don't think that means what you think it does. Hue hue. Strawmen are fun. BTW for those of you that are interested in what the kids do to try and win arguments when they don't have the mental capacity to do so they make strawmen. Here is a little tidbit from wiki, trolls online generally do things like this:
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.[2][3]
This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or an understanding of both sides of the issue.
Allegedly, straw man tactics were once known in some parts of the United Kingdom as an Aunt Sally, after a pub game of the same name where patrons threw sticks or battens at a post to knock off a skittle balanced on top.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_manThat's neat, you're still a beggar that thinks harping on someone about how they make money will get you free things. And no, they aren't going to sue him. You aren't going to sue him. No one here is going to do anything about this, it's just a bunch of beggars, like yourself, trying to get things for free through guilt.
You give no shits about the GPL beyond how you can make money. If you did you would actually be attempting to help him make his work GPL compliant, like either writing a miner that could take protected modules for speed or funding such a project. No you don't put money where your mouth is? Oh, maybe this isn't just about doing the 'right' thing...