Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
CRED.me
on 21/01/2018, 18:40:31 UTC
Anonymint, why are you jacking off about craptocurrency […]  How the fuck is this "the decentralized knowledge age"?

Oh please, you are clearly going down the same path as the socialists/communists.

So the Internet has not benefited the human species  Huh The Internet enabled no decentralization whatsoever? All technology creates is socialism and communism? Nonsense.

Lol, you can't handle the truth of what your malfunction is, can you?

The Internet is only about malfunctions of technology? Nonsense again.

@r0ach (aka @realr0ach) put on Ignore for having too low of an IQ (or personality traits which render his IQ to extreme myopia, absolutism, and Ludditism) to be worth having a discussion with and for slandering my reputation with his conflation of the facts. End of discussion. I have work to do.

He’s conflating unrelated concepts. Socialism and communism require politics. The Internet may participate in socialism and communism but that’s not their only function and impact. The technological designs I’m working on posit to ameliorate the politics of consensus. That’s the entire point of seeking decentralized ledgers. Bitcoin even if ultimately controlled by global elite from behind the mining curtain, is in effect providing more degrees-of-freedom (i.e. less political morass) than nation-state political morasses (which Bitcoin side-steps and disintermediates). Yet I’m repeating myself. That was already explained to him.

@r0ach is a Luddite.

IMO @sidhujag is vindicated on his characterization of @r0ach being disingenuous in discussion. I tried my best. Respectful disagreement is acceptable. But it is not acceptable, the slandering by mischaracterizing another person’s philosophy and intentions, with his logical errors. It’s trolling.

I place greater than 50% odds that @r0ach is greater than 60 years old, perhaps 70s or 80s.