The problem with this is, it's hard to figure out whom this applies to. We have two groups, Bitcoiners, and Detractors (trolls, SA goons, etc)

The situation could be any of the following:

• Bitcoiners are dumb, but think they are smarter than the detractors, and are ignoring the advice of the smart detractors.
• Detractors are dumb, but think they are smarter than bitcoiners, and are ignoring the advice of the smart bitcoiners.

I'm not sure how this dilemma can be settled. I mean, there are a few very very obvious cases (we have some obviously completely retarded bitcoiners, and the detractors, especially a lot of the goons, have a lot of really retarded armchair economists), but overall it's kinda hard to tell. I think, when it comes to making a decision on the Dunning-Krueger, the only winning move is not to play.