If my perception is right, then red-tagging is not 100% accurate? And some of the tagged members might not be involved in shitposting or any event that had led to tagging?
The rate of false convictions in the US
is over 1%.
By massively red-tagging users without a proper analysis for each case, i believe that rate is by far higher in this forum.
By randomly doing statistical analysis based on nothing other than your own belief, you surely are going to get some very accurate estimates.

"randomly statistical analysis based on nothing other than your own belief". What is this, a stretch from Mein Kampf?
looks exactly the justice model and parameters used by Nazi Germany or USSR. Quite unfair in my opinion
