I've been thinking about the fundraising part, and I can concede that being able to eat and keep a roof over your head is equitable. I'm just concerned about the nature of fundraising when it is paired with:
"Get 'em now folks, before they're worth SO MUCH MORE."*(multiple caveats in fine print)
Upon further consideration, that is the real 'meat' of my argument, in addition to the overall blockchain impact - which I'm not very pleased about, since I have no way
(at this time) to say "no thank you, I will
not verify your data". Bitcoin being what it is, it should be
opt-in - the same way it is for what version of client you choose to run
(unless we fork so hard we have to select one).That's another problem, isn't it, it takes off and then we're talking not only about multiples of bandwidth/storage, but the ability of the main bitcoin devs being able to pick up the pace for future expansion and improvement. And since I've never bought the early-stressor argument either, please don't try it, it isn't very convincing.