I really think DT system should be used to prevent people from scamming (or make it a little more difficult at least).
If we leave negative trust to shitposters I think people can end up ignoring the feedback left to scammers/untrustworthy users.
While it would be fair to tag shitposters somehow and stop them, it's certainly not fair to put both them and scammers in the same group.
Scamming or trying to scam is definitely worst than spamming.
Maybe leaving a neutral to users with extreme poor post quality would help? I guess signature managers would have to place some rules about those neutrals besides the current negative ones.
This sums it up perfectly. Great points about scammers and some person speaking in poor English being grouped together.
If we leave negative trust to shitposters I think people can end up ignoring the feedback left to scammers/untrustworthy users.
I agree. I only tag accounts as shitposters if it is obvious to even the brain dead fool. All one or less liners, no contribution to the post.
To date, I have left negative feedback for
61 shitposters, and most, if not all, have never complained about it.
I have seen your TRUST feedbacks and it seems very fair to me. No sign of being an obvious racism or whatsoever. The problem with tagging is that instead of giving a lesson and CLEAR REASON as to why he/she is being tagged, it is now being portrayed as a hatred to the 3rd world, which I don't totally agree.
*Edit: I have encountered a few people (not from this forum) that came from English Speaking Countries yet their English is more worse and than any of those who came from 3rd World.
Vod is absolutely Fair in his feedbacks. If you get a Neg from Vod rest assured he did his research and you deserved it.
Edit: The person you are referring to leaving feedback based on Race is The Pharmacist.
Finally From the Man Himself. Shouldn't this just end the Discussion right here? He's the Boss.
- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.