Just because that's your timeline, doesn't make it correct or the right choice, this coin lacked clear management and consideration from the offset. I'm clearly showing you how you've alienated a large proportion of potential investment & support. I didn't want to refer to your website because it highlights numerous discrepancies and I really would like to see this coin succeed but since you seem to think things are fine:

To an investor and one of the reasons why investment is not sound at the moment(a direct copy off your homepage):

"The main advantage of scrypt is that it lowers the advantage of ASIC Bitcoin miners in the network. This then means that there should be the possibility of more miners joining the network and contributing sufficiently to make it worth their while. Another possibility is there is less energy use as the total network power is less"

This is not the case at all. ASICS are dominating this coin (financially anyway). Please do not try to argue this factually incorrect point on your website.

"Once the last block of PoW is done, Folding@Home kicks in to allow you to earn Medic Coin through CPU/GPU protein folding. Folding@Home software runs while you are doing other things. While you keep gong with your everyday activities, your computer is working to help us find cures for diseases like cancer, ALS, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, and many others."

Fine once Asics have had an opportunity to take easy coin, let's hope we can build a community of folders by basically paying them? There were a whole ton of ways in which this could of been better planned to incentivise gpu farms and I am shocked no proposals came forth since my previous contribution to this topic.....

I begin to wonder if this is sinister rather than a complete lack of understanding of the business and model proposed?