...If the user who marked him is on DT1 or DT2; staff; or any other list to be decided, then the marked user losses the right to wear a signature. This way, it's not up to signature managers to allow them into a campaign or not. The forum would disable the signature for him...
...
Some details should be discussed, but that would be the idea.
But, but! *insert complain from a shitposter*: The DT1/2 members can't participate in a signature campaign themselves, or it is obvious abuse!! ...
Some details should be discussed, but that would be the idea.
This is the kind of bullshit that that suggestion will receive, although I like the idea (something similar was proposed via bans a long time ago).