Yeah, I read the post as well, looks like niggold had something to say about all this slander that is happening to VOISE.  

To quote niggold's reply;

"Opus claims it's the world's first decentralized music platform, and yet if you check out the old VOISE symbol VSM before the 1:1000 split on coinmarketcap.com https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/voise/ you can see that it was listed on JUNE 23, 2017, whereas Opus was listed on Aug 29, 2017 two months after VOISE, not before."

Makes me wonder how Opus can lay claim to being the first decentralized music platform when they where added to coinmarketcap.com 2 months after VOISE, seems to me they got to work after they found out about VOISE.

Also very valid reassurance;

"VOISE is also being successfully traded with good volume on 5 exchanges

Livecoin.net hitbtc.com cryptopia.co.nz bit-z.com coinexchange.io

VOISE has delivered on there announcements to be added to new exchanges in the past, with 5 now and another top 5 exchange on the way I'm not worried when they say they will be adding new exchanges in the future."

I couldn't agree more, they have not failed to deliver in the past, why should anyone doubt them now, they have always delivered.

"This sort of noisy behavior by Experience111 is a good reminder of everyones right to privacy, VOISE could make use of the VOISE masternodes to have anonymous transactions similar to DASH or PIVX to keep the artists earnings private from the publics viewing eyes."

That is a great idea, VOISE should make the transactions untraceable, keeping not only the artists earnings, but others balances private as well. Just the fact that the author Experience111 of the article is sticking his noise where it doesn't belong is exactly why they should ad this feature to the VOISE platform. And now that they already have masternodes in place it shouldn't be to hard to make the changes.