It seem quite strange that Lipe got that red trust for something that he warned me against in the beginning of December when he found out that someone was offering some people in the forum some activities that were for some people who would have alt accounts, and he specifically told me to be careful if someone would approach me with the same proposal because this could cause me to get red trust or ban from the forum.
It´s just amazing that if someone scam the forum and you are offered something dishonest you pay for being a target, doesn´t matter if you go with the scam or not. This police work is going beyond what is fair and right.
I once got red trust from Lauda because I offer to translate a thread, not knowing that was a scam coin. I never got the job but I got a red trust. Does it make sense? I was not promoting the scam, how the F*** I get red trust for something that I never did??

Everybody should be entitled to a defense and since this is a blockchain promoting forum, the community should be able to examine every case and decide if in such cases the red trust should stand or be removed. The fact that someone is a moderator or old enough in this forum does not make the most honest and final authority in the forum, as I have seen accusations against Lauda as well, what is true or not, I don´t know.

Thing is that a voting system should be open in the forum for cases like these where the parties should provide ample proof of accusation and/or innocence and a majority of votes would seal the case. That´s trustless technology model for Christ sake, let´s follow.