Re: Merit - A definition of, Rich people maintain Rich, POOR people will be POOR
You're essentially complaining that you have to make high-quality posts in order to participate in signature campaigns.
If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.
If you want to talk about unfair, think about the Hero Members that have created high-quality posts in the past yet are now bummed out of Legendary status because they're 500 merits away.
Now I wonder who that can be?
What I am seeing is that people still seems to consider Bitcoin as a form of employment, and Bitcoin Talk as an employment bureau and a recruitment medium. It would be great if we could go back to discussing the Bitcoin system, and the way we can use, optimise and expand it. For example it would be really useful if the escrow possibilities were explored, and gained public acceptance.
I love this idea.
Make a vote for any new system coming.
Don't act like a COMMUNIST country, president give the law and people only can follow without any right for agree or disagree.
In this case, you are pretty the same, BITCOINTALK DEVS.
If decisions are taken based on voting system, it will be in favor of those in majority. This will then go in favor of lower rank members I guess who will never agree for this kind of change. I think this is too early to conclude, we should see how this goes for a month or so.