Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Merit - A definition of, Rich people maintain Rich, POOR people will be POOR
by
tambenile
on 25/01/2018, 18:56:55 UTC
At first, it seems to be unfair. However, just think and observe at the forum. Most of the posts were just senseless and obviously were just meant to do the required weekly posts or just to boost ranks. I really think the main aim of this forum is for crypto users to learn, share ideas and at the same time to earn (airdrop or camps.) Of course, I wouldn't wash my hands because at first I was just trying to post for the same reason, however, as I stayed longer, it's obviously not worth reading some of the posts and would be a waste of time reading some of the threads because of most users abuse lax community rules and regulations. I admit it too, that the new system  will be difficult for us to achieve higher rank, but take it a good way to learn and to work harder.

I agree with you in part of not worth reading some spam.

However, if devs want to create such as Merit thing, THEY SHOULD INVENT ONE MORE LEVEL HIGHER THAN LEGENDARY. So everyone work for that. In this topic, "Do you think those Legendary people feel comfortable, free, happy and lucky about this merit score come out?"
Legendaries and hero members are at the safe zone now, why would they care about us ? The only thing they are willing to care about is their position. The fact is 99% Hero members and Legendaries feel happy about this merit system even some of them are under-quality posts Smiley. As i saw, there at least dozens hero members and legendaries made 20 posts today but none of them were merited. How sad is this system ? It's a game for "old club boys" not for newcomers like us. Smiley