Re: Merit - A definition of, Rich people maintain Rich, POOR people will be POOR
I don't agree with this system.
You are creating the definition of "Rich people maintain rich, poor people will be poor forever."
Example: if you was in bitcointalk forum a few years ago, you posted a lot of under-quality posts and you earned Legendary Rank, so it is unfair with new people joining this forum now.
You are creating the definition of "Rich people maintain rich, poor people will be poor forever."
Example: if you was in bitcointalk forum a few years ago, you posted a lot of under-quality posts and you earned Legendary Rank, so it is unfair with new people joining this forum now.
So at first you're accusing the system of not being correct at distributing the "wealth" between members....
Then ..
Don't act like a COMMUNIST country,
...so can you please make your mind what system we should adopt ?
I'm a Full Member - can I agree that it's a good system? 
I see what you did there 
darkstar=lauda=lutpin=theymosWe don't care about shitposters, that's correct.
It's okay , Lauda. I think your life is fulfilled of shits , everything you've said are all about shits. Okay then...
It's okay , Lauda. I think your life is fulfilled of shits , everything you've said are all about shits. Okay then...
For a newbie account you seem to have taken quite a familiar liking to Lauda.
This one I quote from another topic from another person, "I do and i suggest this ideal because i saw too many bitches stay there in the safe zone and tell us to work our ass off ;tell us about contributing to this forum , this community when they actually give nothing to this forum. Are they deserved for the position which they were?"
And one more thing, I suggest already on my topic, make a vote for every member of this forum. Or create a new rank system which Legendary won't sit still and must work to earn that. Are you clear? Or you ignore that part?