Troll BS aside, here is some real research(...)
well, what can I say? If your point was to show that if you mess with the data long enough then you will always find something and it is not possible to tell the real leads from garbage, then you are partly right, but ...
dude, you forgot to factor in blob

yes, it is my last comment to other member

But seriously, if you factored in blob, you would immediately see that your "regularities" fail because for blob the sequence starting at the 8th bit is 000110 and thus it invalidates the first step of your analysis.
There's absolutely no evidence that the width of the inner flame is intentional and that it is a real data track. Even if it were valid data, it doesn't mean the above patterns are invalid. If you read crax0r's analysis, he found that these patterns don't necessarily start at the beginning of the data tracks, so that could still be consistent with the "blob" data. (Even though I'm on the fence as to weather or not that's real data.)