Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Merit - A definition of, Rich people maintain Rich, POOR people will be POOR
by
LTU_btc
on 25/01/2018, 23:14:24 UTC
The bitsend airdrop is just an example, for saying all the profit will belong to LEGENDARY.
And no one say about benefit of the campaigns, we are discussing about the unfair system score.
Do you read all member posted here?
And I said once, and I ask you again, Are you sure after this system come out, spam post won't appear?
Talking is our right and why it must be scored?
We are talking our own idea, opinion, thought. So you mean if someone has their own idea but not really help for answering your topic, they don't have right to say?
User fogocut21 posted very good thoughts above, I'm agree with things what he said, but I will try to add some my minds.
I read all posts in this thread and many others threads about Merit and I don't understand, why do you think that merit system is unfair? If you will post good content, you will get Merit points. After Merit system was implemented, you still have right to say what do you want, you are only not guaranteed to get Merit points. It's something similar like upvotes on Steemit.
But still, there will be lot of spam, because theymos had to introduce Merit system or something similar few years ago when spam problem still wasn't that serious as now. But at least, now new members will be not able to rank up by shitposting and they will have to work harder and improve their posts quality.
And actually, for me idea which was proposed by hilariousandco looks better - if you want wear signature, you need to buy membership. It would reduce account farming. But we need at least some months to see, how effective is new Merit system