These are the matched bits:
Key: 01101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001101001
H+O: 0____101_010____110_101100____0_1_11__1_1_0_111100_010_0111000__110__1_1_1111101_11100111_01_0110_101_01101_001___01111_001__0001_11_0101100_11_011____0 (KeyMatched: 111.0)
H+I: 011_____1___0__0___11___0___1_0___1_011011_1_1___01_1_____1_0010___11__1_1_1_1011___0_1_1__11___01__1__1101000_0__0_1__1__10_000_1_1_010_1001_1_01___1__ (KeyMatched: 82.0)
I+O: 0__10________10_____1___0_00_000_01___1_1____1___0__1_1___1_00________0111_1_101____0_1_11_1____0___10_1101_00__000_1_____1_0000___11010_100__1101_10_1_ (KeyMatched: 83.0)
Yes, but it is not all. Just a reminder, because it was a result by some other Member earlier in a thread:
if you write the inner color track backwards, and you match it against the outer color (forward), all first 17 bits in both streams match. All together, 85 bits match, so the rest may be considered just random (the rest shows 68 matches for 135 bits - just random).
Also, there is an almost perfect match of blob bits against the length bits in two segments. But not in the other segments.
Those kind of results are interesting to me and I am sure when we know the solution it will be very clear why they are there. For now, we must work backwards - from regularities we must try to understand what was actually done in the way of artistic creation.
EDIT: now I am reading in your post that you are aware of those 17 bits. But just a comment from my side: maybe 17 is not intentional. It may have been that a match is by intention in 16 or 15, and 1 or two are just random.