...
Doesn't work with random people.
I'm sure they don't feel 'random' about themselves and you may look pretty random from where I am. What now? Should we do official random/special forum members classification?
And ere you seriously threatening a guy with red-trust for "defamation" when all he did was to apply the same rules to you/aTriz as are being applied to other members?
No? Read the user's exactly wording, then read my wording ('deserve').
I dunno, sounds pretty threatening. If you think that someone "deserves" red-trust, why would you stop yourself from doing that? You're essentially saying that you already have justification for red-tagging them and you're willing to use it.
The guy you replied to already have red-trust from you, so it won't work here, but your post can act as a nice little deterrent to anyone who would want to ever criticise you.
Fuck integrity I guess.
You are standing on the wrong side, easily being played by alts of people that I busted.
Oh am I now? I don't care who akram143/playboy654 are, whatever the (personal) reason behind that post was, the point could still be valid.
I'm leaning in favour of tagging unusual sMerit donations, but what your special, totally-non-random intellect refuses to comprehend is that
you're making it much harder for the taggers.
Now they either have to admit the lack of integrity in their actions and having personal preferences in what is 'taggable' and what isn't. Or go through the mental gymnastics in explaining why it's OK for Lauda to send sMerits to whoever the fuck he wants, while some Russian guy will be tagged for doing exactly the same.