Hi!
Is anyone using KlausT version of ccminer under EthOS? The hashrate is far superior under Windows. I have 1210 compared to 900 for Neoscrypt.
Please advise.
Thanks!
I'm also hoping to hear some feedback on the linux version. Is it even useful? The last commit for the Linux codebase was Nov 4, 2014, while the Windows version was updated 6 hours ago, and all the positive feedback from a few cursory searches seems to be for the Windows version.
It seems like if the linux driver had value it would be in wider use by now, and already incorporated into EthOS if it was going to happen?
But maybe we just need to be the gravel underfoot to give the linux version more traction? I'd really like to know why it hasn't taken off and I plan to look into this more.
Obviously this doesn't help you with the Linux version, but I am using the KlausT v8.19 x64 cuda9.1 in Windows 8.1 and it's a real advantage for neoscrypt hash rates. I have used the Alexis78 version which hasn't been updated in a long time - it produces good hash rates but I find it unreliable and unstable. The latest KlausT CCMiner (for Windows at least) is stable and reliable. I can run it for days without problems.
I have 4 x 1060 6GB, 4 x 1070 and 2 x 1080. I am running pretty much all of them at powerlimit 75%, core +100 and memory +300 and I'm getting 8-12 mh/s neoscrypt mining to Nicehash (the two rigs locally show approx 9.6mh/s but Nicehash is measuring fluctuating hash-rates between 8-12mh/s), using approximately 1400 watts.
If I plug my stats into whattomine.com it recommends mining equihash (if I just consider the nicehash options) but after some experiments and watching the payment rates, I am clearly better off using KlausT to mine neoscrypt.
I do have 2 licenses for EthOS but currently given that there are just so many more options under Windows for Nvidia GPUs (and it's not worth mining ETH anymore) I am begrudgingly using Windows.