Zbyszek2 there is no reason to apologize. And it is not a mistake you made.

I think that it is methodologically correct to compare any regularity you find against random data to verify if it is there by intention or accident. You see, what other way do we have to detect intentional regularities if not like you did?

If we find regularities, we might have a chance to exploit them and discover why they are there, as I tried to describe in my previous post.

So thank you for that piece of info that in principle 42 random bits are enough to get a private key for FLAMEN6 (I admit I was not fully aware of this fact even though crax0r analysis was excellent, but I didn't do that last step of reasoning myself), but still I am positive that all 256-304 bits are written there in the flames somehow. I think your lead from your first post is a very precious piece of information to uncover how to read them and there is no need to undermine it.