The case is from 1994, happened in the previous century. >>it be different nao<<
Can you explain why I'm supposed to take your word on this? What does it occurring in 1994 have to do with anything?
You'll have to be clearer as to why you're hesitant to accept the word i haven't offered.
Are you disputing the date in question? I can assure you it is correct. If you are doubting that 1994 was, indeed, at the tail end of the last century, i can confirm that also. American colloquialism for such a time-span is "more than a coon's age." That's long.