Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.8 (Linux / Windows)
I actually advocated EWBF earlyer, but sticking with DSTM now 
Test ended with average 3049 EWBF vs 3099 DSTM. 50 free hashes? Sounds good for me... --fee 0 didn't helped EWBF. And at least in my case i still see 2% less shares then reported by miner. And even some say they see 1% reduce it still does not save EFBW.
And this is GDDR5X cards witch presumably should have worked better on EFBW.
P.S. I am not related to DSTM or EFBW in any way, long time used both but recent discussion in DSTM thread pushed me to do a test myself. Believe me or not, this was exactly same machiene of 6x1080 (non ti) not tweaked in any way for one or another miner, and it was not even restarted during test period.
https://imageking.eu/images/dstmcompar.png large image
So for us miners it is actually bad, DSTM does not have competition and would get out even with 3% fee....
Test ended with average 3049 EWBF vs 3099 DSTM. 50 free hashes? Sounds good for me... --fee 0 didn't helped EWBF. And at least in my case i still see 2% less shares then reported by miner. And even some say they see 1% reduce it still does not save EFBW.And this is GDDR5X cards witch presumably should have worked better on EFBW.
P.S. I am not related to DSTM or EFBW in any way, long time used both but recent discussion in DSTM thread pushed me to do a test myself. Believe me or not, this was exactly same machiene of 6x1080 (non ti) not tweaked in any way for one or another miner, and it was not even restarted during test period.
https://imageking.eu/images/dstmcompar.png large image
So for us miners it is actually bad, DSTM does not have competition and would get out even with 3% fee....
I won't increase it.