whew! i didn't know i could be that misunderstood..but thanks for replying.
1. i did not say the system was crooked, i said it was being badly abused
2. i did not say large miners get an advantage, i said large miners get an advantage if they split their hash into many, really many, much smaller miners. this is obvious!
3. the top of the block distribution page contains examples of this
i don't understand the math of the subsidy system, so i dont know whether i, with 14*750 and 6*650 hashes would be subsidising others, or receiving a subsidy from others. I do not wish to receive a subsidy from anyone!
i wish this project nothing but good, it is the only witness to Christ in an ocean of wishful thinking.
Peace in Him
This is what I mean my friend - Abused infers the pool system has no integrity. You provide no evidence of abuse, but instead evidence of larger miners mining against the pool, but that is obvious.
I do not desire to run a system that can be abusive either to small or large miners.
On #2, What you are saying is that small feeble nodes make more BBP per hour than large nodes. But that has nothing to do with the pool. I contend that those small solo miners would continue to make more coins in solo than in the pool. Therefore: This has nothing to do with the pool.
On #3, The subsidy system is derived by: Taking a sum of the entire HPS2 of the active winning block in the pool, dividing the block subsidy by the Grand Total HPS2, arriving at a PaymentPerHPS. Then multiplying each rows HPS2 * PPH. This gives the payment per row.
You have to realize the Shares found each 15 minutes by both small and large miners are what drives the HPS2 reading.