I can't disagree; there were plenty of red flags-even before the fall of bitconnect. The fall of bitconnect castes a new negative light into lending type coins.  The fact there is another egold in esports that seems to be far better positioned in the industry than this one is a concerning red flag.  I can chalk that part up as coincidence, but it is still a red flag.  The most concerning claim is about a token buy back.  I don't see any evidence of it in the trading.  Maybe it will be part of the lending platform...Oh, yeah bitconnect.

Lending itself doesn't mean a bitconnect type ponzi scheme, but I don't think anyone knows what the lending system is supposed to be.

  I would lose more sleep if I sold scam tokens than i would by hodling and the tokens became worthless.  Since my tokens are free to me from the air drop, I risk nothing in hodling. Since they gave out .1% stakes to each recipient in the air drop it would be great if they actually did something.

  Missing their own deadline to present their design isn't a red flag as to scam; A scammer could easily spend a few minutes and develop a few images, or pull some from the web and photoshop.  The failure to even provide the images of the current state of the graphics design does raise the question of who, if anyone, is actually designing or developing the platform.