I was wondering about the new system that has been implemented. We all know that it can be challenging to earn even a single
merit, I mean not all the members of this forum are that familiar to what really is going on, especially to the new members.
So I will get to the point, so how about this, let's say we joined a
Signature Campaign it lasts for four weeks. And every week you will be required a number of post, let's say 25 posts. So you've already met that requirement and has been confirmed by the
Manager. We also know that the
Manager reviews your posts if those are constructive, here's the thing why not
reward Merits to those participants that have quality posts, by the
Manager.
Then its not going be hard as before for the participants to earn Merits and eventually rank up.
Does this idea makes any sense? Let me know guys what are your opinion about this.
EDIT:
I have noticed that few people are saying that the CMs don't have enough sMerits or Merits to provide for all the participants but as the suggestion of:
In my suggestion, the managers can just pick one suitable member to be given a Merit. Giving all of them are really a huge problem since there are a lot of members in a Signature Campaign.
OR,
As many as the CMs wants.
In other words you want the campaign managers merit their participants who posts very constructively? is that want you to say? Yes they have a right to merit their posters but no offense here it's not the manager's responsibility to give merits to their quality posters it's not their problem that some posters don't get merits and also, if a poster applied to join in that campaign right? so, he/she already accepted the rules and regulations of the manager. They must follow it in order to get paid. If the posters want to get merited then post constructive and helpful posts. This forum isn't made for earning money okay? Iust be happy that you are paid to post here in bitcointalk.
I think this will add burden for campaign managers having 100 participants then will review 25 post each just for is to gain some sort of merits though they really try their best looking at the quality of our post but this one will require them to read deeper. How about those managers having 2 to 3 campaigns running? I also want some merits but there are really managers who give merits so O don't think this is necessary
Yeah i agree with this one and a example of that is yahoo.