The article implies that Bitcoin was invented as a RESULT of Wikileaks troubles... as sort of an altrernate SOLUTION to Wikileaks donation funding troubles.
I didn't get this impression from the article at all!
The title is the only thing giving me that impression. "Could the Wikileaks Scandal Lead to New Virtual Currency?" implies Bitcoin was precipitated by the scandal, which is obviously not true even from the article since bitcoin has been around for more than a week or whatever.