This issue of Sprout+ and original Sprouts, I thought is has been talked over, why not both team go into meeting and come up with one goal. If this issue is resolved sprouts will take less time to be great.
Just a suggestion anyway.
Hi MOProgress,
I'm reasonably confident the goals and philosophies of the two teams, are worlds apart.
It appears as though (correct me if I'm wrong Sprouts team) the Sprouts team seeks to keep Sprouts operating as it has, trading as a commodity only, with no real capital or organisational structure behind it. Allowing the community to govern the path it takes.
Sprouts+ has set out a business model to interact with non-virtual organisations (real organisations, businesses, charities, etc) for the purpose of helping others through the use of blockchain technology. We have defined the requirement for capital to achieve same. Depending on our degree of success, we plan to open offices and employ and deploy staff in order to achieve our goals.
Sprouts+ is governed by the team, with voting on choices by the community, as long as the outcomes are aligned with the Sprouts+ constitution and philosophy.
Sprouts is sticking to Sprouts code (I believe) whereas, Sprouts+ has cloned Ethereum and written a POS implementation that's likely to be the first Ethereum-based currency with POS rather than POW, which is more in line with our philosophy.