No we do not have any documentation of an agreement with eASIC as you know. All we have is an NDA and that's meaningless. This is why evidence of an actual agreement is so crucial.
So by that same logic, it was a big deal and not merely "symbolic" when Hashfast sent out a press release confirming their deal with ice.drill was complete.
We're striving to set a friendly new tone here in the ACTM threads, but you and Vbs still don't get to have it both ways.
BTW, the 'A' in 'NDA' stands for 'Agreement.'
