61hr tests on each claymore and Phoenix. on nanopool mining ETH
Claymore v10.0
4744 shares accepted
0 rejected
Phoenix 2.5d
4815 shares accepted
0 rejected
1.2% stales
this shows that over these two 61hr periods, Phoenix submitted 1.5% more shares. but phoenix also had 1.2% stales. I'm not sure how to compare this with claymore since claymore's program doesnt report stales.
Set up one machine to ethermine and one to nanopool and see what stale shares are reported? I'm only familiar with ethermine and they report stale shares which are usually slightly higher then whats reported by phoenix because phoenix is a calculated number.