im also a little confused about the counts of shares submitted.
for about 225MH/s
claymore/phoenix reports submitting shares at a rate of about 78-80 shares/hr
but nanopool is seeing about 2x that number of shares at about 170 shares/hr
yet still seeing and calculating the same hashrate. can anyone explain this discrepancy?
What did the pool report during your test and were there any significant differences between Claymore and Phoenix?
pool average fluctuates a lot but overall average is about 1-2% better on phoenix than running claymore, hashrate doesnt matter, accepted shares do, which is why i based my comparison on that number.
other differences are that phoenix doesnt have any fan control or clock/voltage modification where claymore does, and on my rig, even though i see more hashrate with pheonix, i see 10-20W more power consumption as well.