Sure is. He made the claim to be "Steve Golden" with no proof. It's on him to prove it and until that's done I'm not obligated to provide any identifying information since he is more likely Cryptoguy posing rather than actual Steve Golden. But such complicated concept as burden of proof is not something a Pajeet would understand, clearly...
Like all liars you never answer the points raised you simply dissemble some more.
Exactly. Still waiting for the proof you're in fact "Steve Golden". Don't want to waste my time proving anything to CryptoGuy who's delusional enough to think it isn't obvious it's him posting under an alt account.
LOL. Nice logic. The stupid way is for the person who makes the claim to come up with PROOF. But, like I said, that is stupid way. As what you said is the MOST LOGICAL WAY! So much to cheer about this PERFECT GUY!