I agree with Grog and Biodom that the monthly stats are confusing when the number of blocks that we find take weeks. With the very clear mathematical talent that Kano demonstrates, I expect it has been checked and rechecked tons of times over the years. Obviously setting up background daily calculations is probably not an easy thing to implement without a lot of testing and may make the data really inaccurate during the transition. Of course we are all hoping the pool will grow so it will be a non-issue anyway.
So I wonder if an asterisk (*) could be added to the monthly stats (January in this case) when the month has rolled over without a block. then under the monthly table, add the asterisk again with some sort of description below it? At least that would give an indication that it will be updated at the next block.
Beyond trying to offer another thought on this, I would like to remind everyone here that we all are perceived as representatives of the Kano site even though we really are not. I am an old fart that has always told my kids that texting and email communication is much easier to misconstrue versus face to face or phone where reactions are instant. This forum is the same in my book. As tempting it may be to do a quick pop off on a heated topic, please consider a re-read and edit before clicking the post button.
Now lets crack this block so we can get back to the cheering and Mine On!
While I can understand your point of looking at the monthly number that way, the number of blocks we are expected to find in a month is too insignificant to perform any kind of statistical analysis on. Due to our loss of hash from last September and the ridiculous rise in difficulty, our one month numbers are meaningless. Who cares if January looks a little better or February may look a little worse.
Look at some of the bigger pools. The 10 and even 50 block luck swing wildly all the time. Anything less the than 250 block number can change too much with just a couple bad blocks.